this way when using more than 1 max deal we will still be able to see the actual usage as if it stays like this the bankroll become unusable
The issue appears since the -1 was replaced by 200 but none of my bots/deals are over that amount because the new deals have not been placed yet and none have placed that amount of $ for limit orders
I don’t understand what’s the difference between planned theoretical usage and the existing planned category. The way it works now is that planned is all the potential funds the bot can use after filling all max deals and all DCAs. In your case you have over because if the bot opened 200 deals, it will spend that much. If you are going to say “But I have the filter” I can answer already → We cannot calculate what would be the actual usage based on your price restrictions, that would take too much processing power and logic changes. The bankroll assumes that all max deals may be opened and all DCA orders may be filled, is up to you to limit to the actual number the bot can use.
What’s the difference between having a number and not having a number? Remove limits - I want my bot to behave based on market conditions but I don’t know what are the market condition tomorrow - so the bot could open 2 deals today but 10 or 5 or 100 tomorrow - I limit my bots using indicators but allow them to use funds on how many deals they need.
Actual vs theoretical is a big difference - I’m not saying to calculate anything that hasn’t happened yet or based on price restriction but only what’s it’s actually used. Leave the bankroll as is and if you want to add something add the actual used funds that’s far more important than theoretical.
The bankroll and the statistics are a little better now than they were before, when they weren’t using 200 instead of -1. They would be even better with Max Parallel Cost, as I suggested earlier. If we don’t like what these improved statistics show us, we need to rethink our strategies, not the statistics. Their purpose is to show us how our bots and deals really behave and how much money they need, not to trick us with excellent results by hiding unpleasant facts.
I think you are missing the point (very respectfully) - it won’t matter if I have or not the funds or not or if I’m willing to put them in the exchange later.
Give you an example - none of my deal/bots are over YET but in the stats above the over value is off of couple of thousands $ doesn’t it means the bots are over? nope it’s just a theoretical number.
You would never change brother you like too much arguing - the only one hiding is you I’m still waiting to see at least one profitable strategy from you - so far your math hasn’t helped you much as far as I know.
When you will start sharing your results publicly then we can compare the results.
You through a stone and then you say people bull and mock you - your insinuations deserve an answer at some point
Happy to discuss with you when you come from a more respectful place - until then I leave you in peace
So let’s try to figure out what this Feature Requests is all about. The idea is to apply planned and over only to deals that are already open. Deals that aren’t open, even though the bots’ settings would allow them to open in parallel at some point, would show up under planned (extra) and over (extra). Was this intended?
→ We cannot calculate what would be the actual usage based on your price restrictions, that would take too much processing power and logic changes. The bankroll assumes that all max deals may be opened and all DCA orders may be filled, is up to you to limit to the actual number the bot can use.