Bankroll calculation still wrong

[Urma-Gurd]

Bug info:
I’m seeing this almost all the time now, that my bankroll is miscalculated. I reported before, but chalked it up to the 5 minutes calculating it seems to do after a deal close or bot settings change, before it finally shows the correct proportions, but now it’s just plain wrong.

I have 3 active bots:

1. Stopped - 2 active deals $125 each = $250
2. Active - 8 active deals $125 each = $1000
3. Active - 6 active deals $125 each = $750
   So that’s $2000 approx in use, and this screenshot of the bots shows that:
   
   

but the bankroll shows a combined total of $1782.88, and some of that is “over”.

While writing this, the bankroll has changed:

Now I’m guessing that bankroll ignores stopped bots with active deals? I can see that might make sense, but to me it’s not representative of my actual committed bankroll. Right now from the above 3 bots I have approx $2000 committed to deals, and that’s what bankroll means to me.

The exchange view shows by total in exchange, and I’m trying to work out when I can increase my base order and DCA orders from $5 to $6. It should be really easy to see “Cost per deal, and Total bot cost” as separate amounts, and then see that increasing from $5 to $6 goes over my budget or not.

• Bot URLs →

  • Urma 1
  • Urma 2
  • Urma 3

• [Optional] Steps to reproduce → N/A

• Expected result → Bankroll total should accurately show committed finances in DCA bots and active deals

[Urma-Gurd]

I wish!

[maksym.shamko]

Yes, it was ignoring closed deals. That was fixed.
And bankroll calculated against max value of the bots, in your case aroun 2.7k

[Urma-Gurd]

Hmm, ok. Still not sure why it varied from $2000 to current $3600 as above.

So based on what you said, I edited the “Urma 1” bot (stopped with 2 active deals) to have only 2 max deals. Therefore it should be $250 total.

So now I am expecting it to cost $2000 again (250+1000+750)

That’s 16 active deals each 125.

It’s coming down…

But still not right.

[maksym.shamko]

@Urma-Gurd

to current $3600

You dont need to add over to the total vlaue: 965+1446+324 = 2735
Over mean that you need 880 to cover 2735 usage

[Urma-Gurd]

Those calcs don’t sound right though. My Urma bot costs $125 per deal. There’s 16 deals max split among 3 bots. The screenshots show the bankroll changing from $2000 (correct) to wildly different. I’m confused at what’s happening here

[maksym.shamko]

I still can see max usage in bots table around 2.7k.
If you changed max deals to lower than current opened deals, it wont make difference, because max bot usage is not changed.
Perhaps you changed settings on closed, in this case max usage of the bot required bot to restart to take effect. This is workaround, I will fix it on Monday if this actually what happened

[Urma-Gurd]

Ok thanks. I’ll have a look at the numbers again and try and work out what’s happening.

[Urma-Gurd]

Ahah! Got it. So I set max deals on Urma1 down to 2, and then started the bot again. So now all 3 bots have exactly 16 max deals between them, each $125, so $2000 total. And now the bankroll is correct

I think you can argue it either way (bot’s max deals or active deals)

[oisin.oneill]

I do think there is something wrong with bankrolll.

The only USDT deal I have open has max usage of $556.82

[oisin.oneill]

Just in case this helps/clarifies here’s the USDT total in portfolio

[d_yo_r]

I think that the bankroll may have been a nice idea to visualise the current portfolio but that a text box would provide a better overview and also use less space.

[Urma-Gurd]

Yes agree with this. If the bankroll can be summarised with the numbers, and maybe even the bots % usage of the bankroll? Like I have 3 bots and each using a different amount of the bankroll. So the most important numbers for me are:

• bot cost total (eg $1000)
• bot cost per deal (eg $125 x 8 deals)
• bankroll required and available

I do really like the visualisation though. Just need the extra data right next to it.

[aressanch]

Closed bots with active deals were ignored. Current max usage around 2.8k, over 700$

[Urma-Gurd]

I can see it’s a complex set of states to decide whether to include in the bankroll calculation or not.

For me I was transitioning deals to new bots so that my original bot continued the long running deals but didn’t start new ones.

So the calc could include potential of deals if the bot were started again, and therefore warn you’re about to blow your bankroll, or naively assume you won’t do that and your bankroll is active deals.

Tricky. Not sure which is correct / most useful behaviour.

[fred3k]

So is bankroll going to come back to dashboard? Cause I cannot see it for past 2 days…

[maksym.shamko]

Bankroll not showing for users that has more than 200 saved bots. There are also some minor changes of the frontend, to avoid page loading problem you sent me message about.

[fred3k]

I have 155 bots on live, out of which about 30 actually open, and 10 closed and the rest is archived. And I don’t see bankroll so I have to count the funds manually myself… Unless you count the paper ones as well, or perhaps the multi pairs count differently

[maksym.shamko]

Ok, I change your account.
We count all saved not only active

[fred3k]

So I’ve reduced my archived bots, once the count went below 100 the bankroll came back. Thanks for tip!