Bug info:
Hii,
I am running live a Combo Bot as a test on Bitget (675954dd377a182e5fd63655) and it is “ON” and opening deals while its condition to be OFF is clearly met for a while.
It looks a lot like the bug I signaled the other day : when starting conditions was overriding bot controller. Maybe the correction you did was not pushed to Bitget beta ?
Thanks again for your help,
Cédric
Even weirder now, I have another bot with two Supertrend Deal Starts conditions and the two should be “Up Trend” for a deal to start. One of them is down but the bot just strated a deal in front of my eyes.
Bot ID : 675955f1377a182e5fd662b7
Additionally, for the above bug, I made a copy of the AAVE Bot on Bitget Paper Linear and the Bot is not starting deal. So it looks like the bug is on Live only.
I had a briefly look. I noticed strange opposite signals from supertrend in bitget. Will check tomorrow.
Ok, I found another thing very strange in Gainium with the Supertrend.
Opening my AAVE bot here is the display I get with a Supertrend clearly on Down Trend :
Then if I just zoom out on the graph with my mouse to display more bars, I get a green uptrend supertrend on exactly the same bars !?!
What is the “bar back” horizon of the supertrend calculation taken into account by the bot ?
Although I think that this display behavior should be fixed as it is clearly misleading.
Monitoring again this morning, I confirm the Bot Controller doesn’t stop bot properly on Bitget Beta (Supertrend Condition). Bots are starting even if BOT OFF condition is met. Deals are open even when BOT should be Off. I am turning every thing off until this fixed.
Fee higher on bitget
On the spot they are the same as at Bybit 0.1 
@iDimon Can you please create a separate topic and not parasite mine (which is completely different) ? Thanks
Yes, Sorry, no problem, I thought that since the topic is about the beta test Bitget, I’ll write here so as not to create a new topic. I see you have a lot of answers in your topic (just kidding). I hope we’ll help make Gainium on Bitget better together, have a good weekend 
You can open a separate topic if your concern hasn’t been addressed.
The problem with supertrend indicator is thet its actualy cummulative, in internal values used previous values. So it depends when the indicator starts. Also when in started and there is no previous values it shown uptrend by default, this is also behaviour of TV indicator. So it might give false positive signals. I have added a small rounding update to internal values.
And I incresed data needed to start indicator, to cover this start period with false positive results.
Thank you for the adjustments ! The odd behavior is gone and supertrend is now properly calculated and displayed.
