Deal Start Indicators Too Restrictive?

Running a bot with deal start technical indicators (logic is -AND-)

image
image

By the looks of it, some new deals should have opened in the last hour, but nothing has opened. Are these too restrictive in terms of deal open settings?

bot-settings.json (12.3 KB)

1 Like

Did you check the chart and try to backtest these?

Yeah backtest results were good. 307 sortino ratio. But it also didn’t open a lot of deals which is why I was thinking the deal start indicator was too restrictive

QFL doesn’t give signals often, by definition the token has to break a base which is a level of support. If you backtest a larger period there is a table by months and you can figure out how many deals per month on average can you expect to open.

2 Likes

Also QFL is effective if you trade multiple coins at the same time or you may wait a long time between deals.

1 Like

Yeah it’s definitely the QFL - I thought since there are like 20+ pairs on the bot that would be enough but it doesn’t seem to be. Sortino on just super trend is over 1200, but there are a lot of losers on backtesting (still a decent profit overall)

I might try running tests with super trend+rsi and see how that looks. I think I need to play around with a tighter exit TP too

I have try QFL too with BB + DCA in PAPER Mode (All USDT Pair)

I just want Test QFL vs ASAP. Maybe this SS can give some information

and This link for Bot : QFL With BB + DCA

Only Few Deal In 3 Day :grin:




Hi jimmy,

I see that you have 3 starting conditions. One QFL, One RSI crossing a line and one BB crossing a line… all need to happen at the same candle. Maybe you can try RSI lower than and BB lower than if you want to have more deals opened.

1 Like

Or use different time frames where the condition of the longer time frame open those for lower time frames and the lowest time frame condition finally triggers the deal.