Am I right to think that this is a bug? Shouldn’t I get a signal exactly on the same indicator’s marks on the chart?
We have received your bug report regarding the divergences indicator and will update you shortly. Thank you for providing the bot URL, this will assist us in investigating the issue.
We have identified a discrepancy between the signals computed in the backend and what it’s shown in the front end, but debugging this will take a while and we are in the middle of of some important updates so we will look at it after.
just so you know, we noticed the same issue in other indicators (real and paper) like QFL, MA, etc.
This is not something in common with other indicators. Each case needs to be investigated. Could be related to specific exchange and symbol.
yep - I can’t report bugs for other users but I can give you an example
this deal on BITGET ASTER/USDT should have opened in a uptrend but it just opened a random deal
I will check. And bot id will be helpfull.
68f9bad6a9bd6801e4ee23ac (this is a different bot WLDUSD but has the same issue of the example posted above)
This is not one of my bots - but the user said that all his bots using the same condition are not working as they should
thank you for checking
Hello friends, yes, the bots have been opening operations incorrectly, the logic indicates that it opens longs when the 50 EMA is above the 9-period EMA, I was reviewing the trades when it started and it was working correctly, now in the new cycles it seems that it is taking the EMAs in the opposite direction, when the 9 is above the 50 it operates in Long and when it is below it operates in short, it seems that the conditions crossed
I can see real time data now. Its not the condition, its input data. We already had problem with indicators at bitget previously. Problem seems to be fixed, but appears once again.
I understand, I hope you let us know when the problem is solved
