Request option indicator can select opsi OR, not only opsi AND

If the choice of indicators were not limited to just the AND option, but also included the OR option, we could create several alternatives for starting and closing the bot deals.

By implementing this, we can determine when to buy at several points, ensuring we don’t miss the momentum, allowing us to purchase at the lowest possible price and sell at the highest possible price.

This differs from having the indicator options limited to just AND.

Therefore, I am asking the Gainium developers to provide an OR option in addition to the AND option. A menu should be available to select either the AND or OR function so that users can choose. By default, the option might be set to AND, but users should be able to change it to OR, or even combine both AND and OR functions.

Thank you.

2 Likes

It’s a great suggestion - most of the bot platforms only use AND.
I think it should be a group of conditions - (RSI+TA or PSAR+EMA) so the bot executes whatever happens first. This way we are not limited to only one indicator.

VOTED :ballot_box:

I will also add trailing DCA, and trailing start conditions in the feature suggestion as I think they could be a great addition

I am also waiting for an OR option besides the AND option. Having the OR option will make it easier for us to enter when the price is about to rise at any RSI level. If we use AND with RSI, we cannot enter at various RSI positions.

Yes, if use OR option we can make more condition using indicator

Yes, would love it too

It would be very useful to implement logical operators for all trading phases. You could start with just AND, OR, and then proceed with others that are more complex and less commonly used. Thank you for the good work you are doing. Regards, Pepe

And, or and not are enough for a complete Boolean algebra. Everything else can be derived from that. We could also only use nor and brackets, but we probably aren’t that used to it.

Mate I think you should put out some of your strategies - I’m sure you made some really good ones in the past years :orange_heart:

Did those of you asking for or know, that even and and not and brackets are enough to build all Boolean expressions?

A or B = not not (A or B) = not(not A and not B)

AND , OR , NOT . 100% agree. is enoug :+1: