Straightforward Grid vs. Algorithmic Bots: BTC/USDT

Today, I spent some time backtesting the full year of 2024 using various algorithms to trade BTC/USDT on Spot. I like to think of trading BTC/USDT as one of my risk-averse strategies, so my focus was on finding strategies with the highest ROI during the backtest.

Most of the algos I tested yielded around 50% ROI per year, although I’m not done exploring all the possibilities yet. Then, I had an idea to backtest a very simple grid strategy — but with a twist.

The twist was using hindsight: the knowledge that Bitcoin eventually reached 100k. So, I set up a basic grid ranging from 40k to 100k, starting at the price of Bitcoin on December 31st, 2023 (around 43k), and ran the backtest. The result? 69.44% ROI.

Better than any of my algo bots. And with some tweaking to the grid settings, I could probably push the ROI above 70% per year.

To be honest, this result left me a bit disappointed. It’s surprising (and somewhat frustrating) to see that even the most sophisticated algorithms often fail to outperform a straightforward grid strategy.

What do you think?

1 Like

Knowing the exact range is why grid is doing better.

2024 ended with price around your max grid range which is perfect for the bot

2024 was a constant up year for the most part though … from my experience so far, backtesting on bullish charts is gonna give you false hopes. The strategy needs to be optimized and work first on bear charts like 2022

Ditto. If you had hinsight then you may be dissapointed to see the results of the grid when you could have bought at the bottom and sold exactly at the top without any bot. The problem bots solve is not to achieve the best Roi, but to achieve a decent roi despite not knowing what’s going to happen next.

1 Like

Ah, yes… I forgot about 2022… Including it into my test scenarios.