Wrong Backtest result

I think I have found a Bug with this backtest:

https://app.gainium.io/bot/backtests?a=4591&aid=share-backtest&backtestShare=c550c903-8816-442f-ae36-333884e332b8

It seems to good to be true… when I checked some deals I found out that some liquidations did not happen in the backtester, but when I check the chart there is no signal when the DCA entered. @maksym.shamko or @aressanch can you check this out?

Isn’t it that the backtester doesn’t care for available funds and therefore also not for liquidations at the moment?

I don’t know but if it is like that, the backtester is usless.

It simply has limitations that we should be aware of. But of course, the backtester could already make sure to run only under conditions (like on spot only) where it gives reliable results. Unfortunately, other backtesters don’t do this either, like Trading View’s.

But in my case it should just liquidate a deal when it should be…on most of my bots the backtester is very accurate but in this example its not correct, thats why I mentioned it in the bug report. It has nothing to do with funds in my opinion.

You can vote for the feature request I asked some time ago :grin: Portfolio backtesting

We consider shortest path price goes through candle. 0.1% TP on this coin happened almost every candle, though there are deals with longer than 1m duration

I run backtest on auto period, and didnt see any missed liquidation. However with x100 leverage, mostly sure paper and real results will be different. In backtester we do actions in specific order, which wont be the same in real bot. In most cases it gives slight difference, but with high leverage the difference might be big.

Okay I understand. Its just based on theory and the live date is always a bit different especially when it comes to higher leverage.
Thanks maksym