I’ve always been a big fan of controlling risk by keeping my bots on fixed position sizes. One of my main concerns with the “Reinvest Profit” feature was the possibility of platform bugs messing up position sizes and exposing my Futures account to unnecessary risk. So, I’ve always stuck to a fixed size to keep things under control.
But recently, I’ve been rethinking this approach. What if I created 50 bots with the smallest order size allowed by the exchange and enabled the reinvest profit feature? Over time, the most successful bots would naturally grow stronger, increasing their position sizes and generating even more profits. It’s like a form of natural selection – the high-performing bots would thrive, while those lagging behind would stay limited in size, effectively preserving capital.
What’s your take on the reinvest profit feature? Have you used it? I’d love to hear about any pros and cons you’ve experienced with this approach.
I use the reinvest profits and I love it, it’s a great feature. I started using it for the first time on RENDERUSDT pairing, my BO and SO was 50 at the beginning, after 51 deals my BO increased to 59. On other coins with lower BO en SO it increased from 5 to 5.3 in 39 deals
Yes, I completely agree. A coin that pumps hard can just as easily crash hard, and in some cases, even get delisted and go to zero. We’ve seen plenty of examples of this, especially this year.
However, if we’re “live testing” an algorithm or bot setup, one potential way to identify the most effective strategy is to let it feed on its own success. That’s the rationale I’m suggesting here for using the “reinvest profit” feature.
Of course, managing our capital ourselves is crucial, so I wouldn’t advocate giving the bot 100% of the profits it generates. But allocating, say, 10% for reinvestment could provide just enough “fuel” for the successful bots to “grow” while still keeping overall risk in check.
Just thinking out loud about this as a potential approach to strategy selection—what do you think?
Another thing to consider is if compounding is better than diversifying assets. Some people follow the Hunter whale strategy long+short with all available pairs on Binance. I don’t have direct experience with this but you can read more here: Market Maker Bot Strategy
The issue is that requires large amounts of capital, so you could start with as many pairs as possible and then add more pairs when there is enough profit.
I know some people are using this strategy, perhaps they can comment on their results so far @Rossano@daniele.micheloni
The information in the above link are incorrect and for those less experienced misleading.
The long/short strategy is one of the most affordable strategies I used so far - if you think that with less than $300 you can cover a pair from the current price up to -100% and +400% it’s hard to bear - people believe that because the whales are running this strategy isn’t for medium or even small fishes which is absolutely wrong - if you can use $1 as min order size a pair will cost you around $100.
The reason why I’m sharing my daily profits and on going results on telegram is to let people understand the whole process - so far with less than $9K I made just over $1k (not bad in spot from my point of view)
I want Ask About Reinvest Profit. If it on Multi Pair, said it 50 Coin on One Long Bot, did it will reinvest in profit coin or diversification. Thanks you
